Management Of The Leadership Theories †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Management Of The Leadership Theories. Answer: Introduction Leadership refers to the skills encompassed by an individual, the ability of a person to lead and guide another person, a team or an entire organization (Northouse, 2015). The various studies of leadership have theories, which involve traits, interaction with one another, behavior, vision and values among others. The search for characters and traits in individuals has been going on for a long time. The trait theory had gained popularity and focused on individual and multiple attributes necessary for effective leadership. The trait theory was criticized by many critics and there was the emergence of the behavioral leadership theory. Discussion The Behavioral Style of leadership evaluates the behavior of successful leaders and identifies their behavior styles that make them successful. The behavioral theory is said to be a perspective on management, which emphasizes on the importance of the attempt to understand the number of factors that affect human behavior in the organizations (Yukl, 2012). The internal reactions and external reactions also affect the behavior of the individual. The theories of the behavioral leadership are the human relation theory, the behavioral science theory, classical conditioning and operant conditioning. Human relation Theory The human relation theory refers to the way that helps the leaders to manage and interact with others and their subordinates. The leader focuses on the management of human relations and the morale of workers that is reflected upon positively. There is increase in the productivity and efficiency of the workers and the organization in concern (Lussier Achua, 2015). This theory began by the experiments of Professor Elton Mayo. The belief of this theory is that people desire support that helps them to develop and grow. The employees get individual attention that helps them get motivated which increases productivity. Behavioral Science Theory Behavioral science is important in management of a business as it studies the behavior of a human being and this is related to the study of sociology and psychology. The concern is in the ways in which the people tend to behave. The behavioral Science theory includes motivation, attitude and perception towards the employees. Motivation inspires the employees and increases interest (Malik, Aziz Hassan, 2014). The enhancement of positive attitude enhances the performance of the organization. Perception enables the interpretation of stimulation of senses and converts them into meaningful information. Classical Conditioning Classical conditioning also referred to as the Pavlovian conditioning is the procedure of learning where a biologically potent stimulus is paired with the neutral stimuli. The learning process is a result which is through the pairing and a response is achieved which is similar to the person who has the potent stimulus. It is the basic learning process of an individual. Operant Conditioning Operant conditioning is the process that attempts to adapt to the behavior of a person using positive and negative support. The individual shares a relationship between the behavior of the person and the consequence. Situational leadership theory and Path-goal theory The Situational leadership theory of leadership explains leadership through the leader telling, selling of ideas, participating in decision-making and delegation. The maturity of leader is seen by the level of maturity from low to high. The effective leaders base their behavior on the development level of the group members. The leadership is explained through direction, coaching, supporting and delegating. The path-goal theory specifies the style of the leader that best fits the employee and environment at work. The leadership is explained here by the motivation, empowerment and the satisfaction of the leader and his employees (Antonakis House, 2013). The path-goal types of leader behaviors are direction provided by the leader, support, participation and achievement by setting of challenges that brings the desired results. Leadership is explained when the leader actively takes part in the activities of his employees at work and achieves the desired results. Differentiation between Transactional and Transformational leaders Transactional leaders work I an existing organizational culture while the transformational leaders emphasize on the new ideas, which help to transform organizational culture (McCleskey, 2014). The transactional leaders provide rewards and punishments according to the standards of the organization, while the transformational leaders achieve the desired results from employees by keeping them invested in various projects, which leads to high-order reward system. The transactional leaders appeal self-interest of employees while transformational appeal to group interests (Kark Shamir, 2013). The former is more akin to the common notions of management while the latter adheres more closely, to what is generally referred to as leadership. Differentiation between Charismatic and Visionary leaders The charismatic leaders are people who gain due to their personality. The charm of the leaders make the individuals think like them and retain this feature. This charisma is a natural trait of how the leader conducts his behavior and cultivates the practice in the employees. While the visionary leaders use the ideas that can motivate individuals. The leader may have a particular vision for better working conditions (Avolio Yammarino, 2013). The main difference between charismatic and visionary leaders is the source of their leadership trait. The strength of a charismatic leader is the ability to sell the product while the visionary leader has a particular vision for future. Thereby, the essay discusses the types of behavioral leadership. The essay also discusses situational leadership theory and path-goal theory. The report concludes with the differentiation between transactional and transformational leaders and charismatic and visionary leaders. Thus, a clear discussion about the theories of leadership in management has been discussed. References Antonakis, J., House, R. J. (2013). The full-range leadership theory: The way forward. InTransformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition(pp. 3-33). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Avolio, B. J., Yammarino, F. J. (Eds.). (2013). Introduction to, and overview of, transformational and charismatic leadership. InTransformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition(pp. xxvii-xxxiii). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Kark, R., Shamir, B. (2013). The dual effect of transformational leadership: Priming relational and collective selves and further effects on followers. InTransformational and Charismatic Leadership: The Road Ahead 10th Anniversary Edition(pp. 77-101). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Lussier, R. N., Achua, C. F. (2015).Leadership: Theory, application, skill development. Nelson Education. Malik, S. H., Aziz, S., Hassan, H. (2014). Leadership behavior and acceptance of leaders by subordinates: Application of path goal theory in telecom sector.International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance,5(2), 170. McCleskey, J. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development.Journal of Business Studies Quarterly,5(4), 117. Northouse, P. G. (2015).Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications. Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention.The Academy of Management Perspectives,26(4), 66-85.